Panel Statements for 1984
All the links in the following table are to documents in PDF format.
Number | Date | Subject | Summary |
---|---|---|---|
1984/15 | 18/12/1984 | QUALITY OF TAKEOVER CIRCULARS | Panel’s concerns about the quality of takeover circulars in particular the use of misleading graphs and diagrams |
1984/14 | 07/12/1984 | GLANFIELD LAWRENCE PLC | Panel ruling on Rule 34 (as it then was) price to be offered |
1984/13 | 26/10/1984 | GLANFIELD LAWRENCE PLC | Procedure for dealing with the Rule 40 (as it then was) breach |
1984/12 | 24/10/1984 | GLANFIELD LAWRENCE PLC | Reasons for dismissing an appeal against a ruling of the Panel Executive |
1984/11 | 24/10/1984 | GLANFIELD LAWRENCE PLC | Notification that an appeal against a ruling of the Panel Executive has been dismissed |
1984/10 | 17/10/1984 | GLANFIELD LAWRENCE PLC | Notification of Panel hearing to be held on 22 October |
1984/09 | 08/10/1984 | GLANFIELD LAWRENCE PLC | Notification of breach of Rule 40 (as it then was) and Panel hearing to consider potential breach of Rule 34 (as it then was) |
1984/08 | 05/09/1984 | THE LINCROFT KILGOUR GROUP PLC | Extension of offer timetable due to release by offeree company of complex solvency report |
1984/07 | 08/06/1984 | DONALD MACPHERSON GROUP PLC | Panel ruling that offeror should not have published confidential offeree profit forecast |
1984/06 | 01/06/1984 | THE RULES GOVERNING SUBSTANTIAL ACQUISITIONS OF SHARES | Clarification as to how “investment managers” should be interpreted |
1984/05 | 16/05/1984 | FRANCIS INDUSTRIES PLC | Result of investigation into share dealings |
1984/04 | 13/03/1984 | STATEMENTS MADE DURING THE COURSE OF AN OFFER | Guidance on statements made during the course of an offer |
1984/03 | 28/02/1984 | LONDON BRICK PLC | Notification that an appeal against a ruling of the Panel Executive has been dismissed |
1984/02 | 09/02/1984 | LONDON BRICK PLC | Notification of Day 60 |
1984/01 | 03/02/1984 | GLENEAGLES HOTELS PLC | Notification that an appeal against a ruling of the Panel Executive has been upheld |